When the comparison matters
This is one of the first questions on any tender-offer mandate. The identity of the buyer drives:
- The legal frame (Rule 13e-4 vs. Reg 14D)
- The tax outcome for sellers
- Whether the company’s balance sheet is affected
- Whether the offer counts as a buyback
Practical posture
- Public-company buybacks structured as tenders — issuer tender offers under Rule 13e-4
- Public-company M&A — almost always third-party tender offers
- Private-company employee liquidity — historically third-party (outside investor funds the secondary leg); some companies now mix in a corporate-funded portion alongside the third-party leg
Hybrid structures
Modern private-company programs (Stripe 2026, for example) sometimes combine both: a third-party investor takes most of the secondary, with the issuer also repurchasing a portion. The combined structure adds complexity but lets the company adjust the cap-table outcome more precisely.