When the comparison matters
The mandatory bid rule is one of the most consequential structural differences between the U.S. tender-offer regime and most non-U.S. takeover regimes. A 30% accumulation in the U.S. triggers Schedule 13D disclosure and Williams Act tender-offer rules; the same accumulation in the U.K., E.U., Hong Kong, or Australia triggers a mandatory bid for 100% of remaining shares at the highest recent price.
Why the U.S. doesn’t have one
The Williams Act focuses on disclosure rather than mandating equal exit — the federal regime trusts state corporate law and fiduciary-duty doctrine to protect minorities post-acquisition. State fair-price provisions and §203 partially fill the gap, but the structural protection is materially weaker than EU-style mandatory bids.
Practical posture for cross-border buyers
A would-be acquirer planning a 30%+ stake in a non-U.S. target needs to model the mandatory-bid trigger upfront — crossing the threshold without intent to bid for 100% is rarely viable.