When the comparison matters
The choice between a tender offer (followed by a back-end merger) and a one-step merger is one of the first structuring decisions in any U.S. public-company acquisition. Since Delaware §251(h) was added in 2013, the tender offer + immediate squeeze-out merger structure has become the default for cash deals because it closes faster than a one-step merger and avoids the cost of a proxy statement.
When one-step mergers still dominate
- Stock-for-stock deals — the registration overhead of an exchange offer often makes a one-step merger simpler
- Very large or complex transactions — extra months for shareholder vote may be acceptable
- Cross-border deals — the tender-offer-plus-squeeze-out path doesn’t translate cleanly to all jurisdictions
The hybrid in private companies
Private-company “tender offers” don’t need the merger framework at all — there’s no public minority to squeeze out. The result is just a structured share purchase from a defined eligible-seller pool, with no back-end merger required.